Businesses Lack Understanding of Risks with Third-Party Vendors, Suppliers and Contractors: Survey

Supply Wisdom unveils the findings of its first annual survey, "Risk Management in a Technology-Driven World," conducted to gauge attitudes toward risk management at companies of varying sizes and locations.

Adobe Stock 376383262
Cagkan/stock.adobe.com

Supply Wisdom unveils the findings of its first annual survey, "Risk Management in a Technology-Driven World," conducted to gauge attitudes toward risk management at companies of varying sizes and locations. The survey specifically looks at how companies are tackling risk assessment within their vendor and supplier populations, the types of risks they are prioritizing, and their use of technology and artificial intelligence (AI) to monitor risk, among other themes.

"We live in an increasingly volatile and unpredictable world, where the pace of change is continuously accelerating. Companies, driven by the need to stay competitive while reducing costs, are outsourcing various functions to third parties with increasing frequency," says Tom Thimot, CEO of Supply Wisdom. "The trend shows no sign of slowing as businesses seek specialized expertise and efficiencies, but this extensive reliance on third-party vendors brings a host of new challenges and risks. Yet concerningly, our survey found that most participants do not have a clear understanding of the make-up of their supplier, vendor, and contractor populations—or the risk levels that may exist within those groups."

With rising geopolitical, economic and environmental uncertainties, outsourcing certain functions can save organizations time and money, and potentially unlock new revenues. However, with these benefits also come potential risks that may exist within their supply chains and vendor relationships. This is why vendor, supplier and contractor assessments are key to a successful third-party risk management strategy – but not all assessment methods are created equal.

Many companies have begun to recognize that traditional assessment methods are no longer sustainable in today's risk management landscape and that they must instead embrace innovative technology to monitor risk. The report found that nearly 80% of respondents view technology as very or extremely important in risk management programs. However, there appears to be a disconnect between perception and action as 57% of respondents report that they do not currently use AI in their risk assessment.

Key Takeaways:

  • The top risk types monitored for are Financial Risk (65%), Operations Risk (64%), Compliance Risk (51%) and Cyber Risk (51%).
  • Less than 15% of procurement and supplier management professionals, respectively, report using continuous monitoring tools to assess suppliers, highlighting an underutilization of technology in risk assessment.
  • 62% of businesses do not strongly believe their risk monitoring program is meeting contractual and regulatory requirements.
  • North American companies use fewer third party & Nth party vendors than European companies. 47% of European companies reported vendors in as many as 49 countries, compared to 22% of NA companies who said the same.


Latest